<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Specialty Executives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com</link>
	<description>Winning the War on Talent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers Pressing the Pentagon to Keep Funds in Battlefield Network</title>
		<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lawmakers-pressing-the-pentagon-to-keep-funds-in-battlefield-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lawmakers-pressing-the-pentagon-to-keep-funds-in-battlefield-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Specialty Executives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army modifies ground combat vehicle strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army selects android for mobile battlefield network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army support of further development of a Battlefield Communications Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army supports battlefield network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget cuts having serious effect on army modernization programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military job search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military online presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile connectivity on the battle field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunity for job growth in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty executives blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where is the army going]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/?p=1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seventy one members of the US House of Representatives are pressing the Defense Department not to transfer funding from a battlefield communications network to pay for more urgent needs.  In a letter sent on May 10 to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, these lawmakers, the majority of them being Democrats, said that they support two of [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lawmakers-pressing-the-pentagon-to-keep-funds-in-battlefield-network/">Lawmakers Pressing the Pentagon to Keep Funds in Battlefield Network</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com">Specialty Executives</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lawmakers-pressing-the-pentagon-to-keep-funds-in-battlefield-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lockheed CEO – Claims Future is Bright, Despite Sequester</title>
		<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lockheed-ceo-claims-future-is-bright-despite-sequester/</link>
		<comments>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lockheed-ceo-claims-future-is-bright-despite-sequester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Specialty Executives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed optimistic despite spequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed revenue increase will come from sales of cybersecurity technology C-130J cargo planes missile defense systems F-16 jets and F-35 joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed’s leaders started developing their own estimates of the potential impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marillyn Hewson lockheed sequester cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military budget crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onset of sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon budget cuts in more favorable terms less than three months after sequestration went into effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration and military budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration and the army budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty executives blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/?p=1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>About a year ago, Robert J. Stevens, CEO and president of Lockheed Martin Corp. at the time, described the idea of draconian cuts to government spending as equivalent to “blunt force trauma” for the defense industry. Steven’s successor Marilyn Hewson spoke of Pentagon budget cuts in more favorable terms less than three months after sequestration [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lockheed-ceo-claims-future-is-bright-despite-sequester/">Lockheed CEO – Claims Future is Bright, Despite Sequester</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com">Specialty Executives</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/lockheed-ceo-claims-future-is-bright-despite-sequester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army Still Supports Battlefield Network</title>
		<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/army-still-supports-battlefield-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/army-still-supports-battlefield-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Specialty Executives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army selects android for mobile battlefield network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army support of further development of a Battlefield Communications Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army supports battlefield network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army testing smartphone add-on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget cuts having serious effect on army modernization programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintaining military readiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military-minded defense against cyber attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration and the army budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty executives blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where is the army going]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/?p=1267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Army officials are in support of further development of a Battlefield Communications Network even though they will be transferring funding from the program this year to pay for more urgent needs. The war fighter information network is a high-speed, high capacity communications network to be used in a war zone.  Increment 2 which is the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/army-still-supports-battlefield-network/">Army Still Supports Battlefield Network</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com">Specialty Executives</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/army-still-supports-battlefield-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequestration Affecting Army Programs</title>
		<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/sequestration-affecting-army-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/sequestration-affecting-army-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Specialty Executives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[across the board sequestration cuts threaten JLTVs planned schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army marine corp joint light tactical vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army's third effort to replace Kiowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget cuts having serious effect on army modernization programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massive budget cuts for the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military budget crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration and military budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration and the army budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty executives blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/?p=1262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The sequester is creating problems for the Army.  The Army/Marine Corp Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program’s testing schedule may be pushed back as far as four months by the end of this fiscal year.  The top acquisition adviser to the secretary of the Army, Lieut. Gen. William Phillips told the Senate budget panel that [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/sequestration-affecting-army-programs/">Sequestration Affecting Army Programs</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com">Specialty Executives</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/sequestration-affecting-army-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget Crunch Will Affect Army</title>
		<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/budget-crunch-will-affect-army/</link>
		<comments>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/budget-crunch-will-affect-army/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Specialty Executives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's not all gloom and doom for the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massive budget cuts for the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military budget crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new army developments for infantry troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration and military budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty executives blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilizing technology in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where is the army going]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Army can continue to send troops to Afghanistan.  However, the current budget crisis will prevent troops from being ready to deal with wars like those that could stem from the North Korea or Syria conflicts.  This is the position that Gen. Ray Odierno, Army Chief of Staff is taking because of the budget constraints.  [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/budget-crunch-will-affect-army/">Budget Crunch Will Affect Army</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com">Specialty Executives</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/budget-crunch-will-affect-army/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army’s Second Radar System &#8211; Range Radar Replacement Program</title>
		<link>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/armys-second-radar-system-range-radar-replacement-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/armys-second-radar-system-range-radar-replacement-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Specialty Executives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general dynamics c4 systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new generation of range instrumental radars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provide unprecedented fidelity when tracking munitions and other targets in a range of 37 miles or more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range Radar Replacement Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replace the aging fleet of radar systems currently being used at White Sands Test Ctr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replacement program awarded to a General Dynamics led team in June 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialty executives blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Executives Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/?p=1254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Based on a General Dynamics press release on May 2, 2013, the Army presented General Dynamics C4 systems with a revised contract for the Range Radar Replacement Program (RRRP) to develop a new High/Medium Power Close-in Radar system.  This is a mobile system that will provide unprecedented fidelity when tracking munitions and other targets in [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/armys-second-radar-system-range-radar-replacement-program/">Army’s Second Radar System &#8211; Range Radar Replacement Program</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.specialtyexecutives.com">Specialty Executives</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.specialtyexecutives.com/blog/armys-second-radar-system-range-radar-replacement-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
